All the talk recently has been about Google+ and can it beat
Facebook at the social networking game? But a more interesting question
to consider is the heated Google vs Facebook competition. If you just
examine the Alexa numbers alone, you will see that Facebook is beating
Google hands-down in some very important traffic stats.
Actually,
in both May and June, Facebook knocked Google out of the number one
position a couple of times, you can see this if you compare the stats
for Google and Facebook in Alexa. But where Facebook must have Google
really concerned is in the number of "Pageviews" and "Time Spent on
Site" - Facebook easily wins the day.
Google had to do something
to compete with Facebook, otherwise Google would have to give up its
position as the top site on the web. Perception is everything on the web
and Google would lose both revenues and reputation, if it has to settle
for second place.
Will Google+ become popular?
Google+
might catch on or it might not, anyone remember Google Buzz, Google
Wave, or even iGoogle - those haven't exactly been knockouts with 3/4 of
a billion users? Could Google+ go the same route?
Right now,
Google+ is getting some good press and everyone seems to be clambering
for an invite. Google says it's testing out the system with a few users
at first - which is very hard to swallow. Given all the resources Google
has at its disposal, they should be able to roll-out any system, with
10s or even 100s of millions, signing up.
Could this limited
availability be a marketing ploy on Google's part and somewhat
fabricated? By limiting supply, even on a free product, you create a
built up demand for that product. Old marketing trip that still works
wonders for any campaign.
Regardless, Google+ has some features
worth considering if you like these social networking cesspools. I
particularly like the "Circles" feature, where you can limit
contact to a certain group of people - such as keeping your close
friends and family totally separated from your work or business
colleagues. This has been one of my major problems with Facebook... I
don't want to mix the people I meet and work with online to have access
to my family contacts and friends. In other words, you want to keep the
people you "truly" know away from online acquaintances and contacts.
Just common sense at play here, especially in regards to safety and
security.
Besides these "Circles" Google+ is divided up into four other features:
Instant Upload
- You can instantly upload your videos and photos to your account (in
the cloud) and then decide which group or circle of friends you want to
share them with.
Hangouts - Group video chat where you can
talk to up to 10 friends at once. The person talking the loudest will
be featured in the spotlight, with the others displayed below.
Teenagers will probably like this feature the most, but it could also
become popular for business conferencing.
Sparks - Tell it
what you like or want and this program will bring interested related
stuff to your attention. Used to spark discussions and sharing the stuff
that floats your boat with friends and colleagues. This is basically a
search engine disguised as socialized chit-chat, wonder if Google
knows anything about search engines?
Huddle - Group text
chat where everyone can talk at the same time. Makes it easier to get
everyone on the same page and again' may become popular with the younger
set. This feature can be used directly from your phone, if you're using
an Android 2.0+ or an iPhone 4.0+ phone.
I believe the whole
"Trust" issue could be a major factor in the success of Google+... I
believe Google has built up a lot of trust with web surfers, this could
bring onboard a lot of users.
But even with some good press and
some good reviews, especially when it comes to the "Circle" feature of
grouping friends, doesn't mean hundreds of millions will be leaving
Facebook for Google+. Geeks and techies will no doubt jump ship faster
than your regular "moms and pops" on Facebook.
Once you have all
your networks built up in Facebook, most people are not going to jump
ship just because another program comes along, even if it's from Google.
Then again, we always have to remember, the Internet is very "fluid"
and changes quickly.
MySpace was once the most popular Facebook!
But
many web users will always think of Google as a Search Engine and leave
it at that; they will keep their social connections separate. However,
Google+ only has to cut into Facebook's numbers, to knock Facebook back
down a couple of pegs. And/or to stop Facebook from getting to a
Billion Users, which will have its own bragging rights.
Of course,
I look at all this stuff from an SEO viewpoint, Google+ will give
Google another powerful way to rank web content. It will be another
large pool of data Google can draw upon to discover what content,
sites, videos, articles... users are sharing and recommending. I don't
believe Google gives a hoot about the social aspect, they probably don't
give a hoot about you or your aunt Sue, but they do care about what you
and your Aunt Sue are doing online, what sites are important to you and
which content you're viewing.
I believe a major SEO shift is happening in the background...
Instead
of just backlinks, Google is now looking more closely at your whole
site and content, ranking it accordingly. Google MAY also be getting
ready to switch more of their ranking signals towards their OWN data
coming from 160+ million Google Chrome users, the new Google +1 Button
and the even newer Google+ social networking platform we are talking
about here. Plus, Google also has all that data from YouTube, Google
Analytics, AdSense and AdWords... and of course, all that countless
data from its own search engine and how people use it.
However,
getting back to our original question, can Google+ be a "Facebook
Killer" as many people are suggesting? Is this the end of Facebook?
It's
way too soon to be making those kind of calls, but despite its rather
awkward name, Google+ will eat away at Facebook's numbers and members.
Perhaps, it just has to slow down the Facebook bandwagon enough so that
Google can hold onto the top spot on the web. If I were Facebook, this
new entry would cause me some concern and I would be adding new
features like video chat and keeping a close eye on what Google is
doing with Google Plus.
At first glance, I thought the choice of
Google+ was a rather awkward name, but if you combine it with the Google
+1 button it makes much more sense. Especially when you look at this
not as a social network, but more as a ranking system designed by
Google to help it provide higher quality rankings in their index.
Nothing wrong with that and everyone benefits; besides, killing two
birds with one stone is not a crime.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment